Angband Forums

Angband Forums (http://angband.oook.cz/forum/index.php)
-   Vanilla (http://angband.oook.cz/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=3)
-   -   5 May 2011 development release(s) (http://angband.oook.cz/forum/showthread.php?t=4416)

PowerDiver May 6, 2011 19:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnate (Post 52556)
What bothers me about this is that I don't have any real idea which bugs/issues you (and other forks) consider intolerable and which are just irritants. IMO it might be worth adding a "severity" field to trac so that we can distinguish tickets in this way, and focus on fixing the top-rated ones.

Some examples that come to mind:

Dungeon areas with no stairs, which is a killer for ironman or disconnected_stairs. Pits missing a wall. Invisible purple monsters. Since I focus on id-by-use issues, failure of dInv is a much bigger deal to me than to others. The newest one is the failure of weak wands like -sleep to affect even cutpurses. I haven't made it to testing if that was fixed or is still broken.

I wouldn't be surprised if half the issues I consider severe no one else find even serious, and presumably I am not the only one with a specific personal viewpoint, so I don't know if a new severity field is worth the effort.

Chud May 6, 2011 19:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnate (Post 52554)
I added code to rd_item_2 which should convert the flags of objects in old savefiles so that they stack properly with new objects, but for some reason this isn't working.

Ah, okay. Time permitting I may try to see what's going on there (dust off my meager C skills a little). In the meantime it sounds like I should be able to solve the problem by ditching any items brought over form the previous build and just acquiring new ones in the current version then.

Quote:

In the meantime, apologies for the inconvenience w.r.t. stacking.
No worries at all - such is the world of the development release. :)

d_m May 6, 2011 20:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerDiver (Post 52526)
I was wondering if it's completely unintentional, or a goof on something similar but intentional.

Don't look too hard. The previous nightly I have is dated 1/13, so it could have been introduced much earlier.

I can confirm that my character was completely unable to put a white icky thing to sleep with a wand of sleep monster.

This is in trac as bug #1427

myshkin May 7, 2011 01:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerDiver (Post 52501)
There seems to have been a change, as of the 4/22 stuff I have been messing with, that gives monsters saving throws when they didn't use to have them. I couldn't even ID a wand [sleep monster I think] with repeated aims at a cutpurse. Was there any change to that in this 5/5 release?

I'm having trouble reproducing this; I was able to ID-by-use a wand of confuse monster with a level 1 dwarf priest versus a small kobold at 50' on the first try. With what level character were you aiming the wand? The base resist chance for sleep monster wands versus cutpurses is 27%, minus 1% for every five player levels.

(White icky things, being STUPID, cannot be slept.)

myshkin May 7, 2011 01:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chud (Post 52570)
Ah, okay. Time permitting I may try to see what's going on there (dust off my meager C skills a little). In the meantime it sounds like I should be able to solve the problem by ditching any items brought over form the previous build and just acquiring new ones in the current version then.

No need to spend effort here. I believe I've found and fixed the bug. But yes, your workaround should work between now and the next development release.

will_asher May 7, 2011 01:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by myshkin (Post 52582)
(White icky things, being STUPID, cannot be slept.)

So sleep monster was made even more useless than it already was?

Derakon May 7, 2011 01:29

If a monster can be asleep, then it should be sleepable. Therefore either mindless monsters should be sleepable or they should always start out awake. Given how marginal sleep-monster is already I'd lean towards the former.

PowerDiver May 7, 2011 01:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by myshkin (Post 52582)
I'm having trouble reproducing this; I was able to ID-by-use a wand of confuse monster with a level 1 dwarf priest versus a small kobold at 50' on the first try. With what level character were you aiming the wand? The base resist chance for sleep monster wands versus cutpurses is 27%, minus 1% for every five player levels.

I don't know, a paladin probably CL around 20 to 25. I could have been unlucky 4 times in a row before giving up. It might even have been just 3 tries, though I think it was 4 -- the only reason I tried multiple times was that I thought it might be wonder.

There didn't use to be much of a base resist. You were pretty much certain up to ML 11, and it was pointless beyond that. My original post was asking if there had been a change, rather than reporting it as a bug.

How long has a cutpurse had a save over 20%? It would surprise me that I did not notice.

myshkin May 7, 2011 02:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by PowerDiver (Post 52586)
I don't know, a paladin probably CL around 20 to 25. I could have been unlucky 4 times in a row before giving up. It might even have been just 3 tries, though I think it was 4 -- the only reason I tried multiple times was that I thought it might be wonder.

There didn't use to be much of a base resist. You were pretty much certain up to ML 11, and it was pointless beyond that. My original post was asking if there had been a change, rather than reporting it as a bug.

How long has a cutpurse had a save over 20%? It would surprise me that I did not notice.

Good question, and I didn't know the answer until I looked it up. The change in behavior appears to have entered the codebase at the end of January, with the merge of Jeff's monster pain messages patch (with some fixes from CunningGabe). Previously, immunity to sleep was governed only by the NO_SLEEP or UNIQUE flags; saving throw was 0 until level 11, and then was (mlvl - 10) in (clvl - 10). Now, immunity to sleep comes from NO_SLEEP, STUPID, EMPTY_MIND, WEIRD_MIND, and UNDEAD. Uniques get three saving throws (I think this is supposed to be two saving throws, but some code is duplicated). The saving throw is (25 + mlvl - clvl/5) in 100. The upshot is that it is easier to sleep high-level monsters than before, but much harder to sleep low-level monsters.

Jeff, if this is not what you intended, please comment.

will_asher May 7, 2011 02:48

Why would STUPID and WEIRD_MIND make a monster immune to sleep? doesn't make sense. What's the point of the NO_SLEEP flag if you use a bunch of different flags to decide what is immune to sleep? If something should be immune to sleep, it should have that flag, otherwise it should be able to be put to sleep.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:17.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.