Angband.oook.cz
Angband.oook.cz
AboutVariantsLadderForumCompetitionComicScreenshotsFunniesLinks

Go Back   Angband Forums > Angband > Development

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 12, 2010, 13:08   #1
Twilight
Apprentice
 
Twilight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 58
Twilight is on a distinguished road
Bug (possible) with rating for OOD objects in r2038

I noticed that you get a lot of good feelings etc nowadays and checked out what caused this. Apparently (if I'm not wrong) an objects level (first number after "W:" in object.txt) is not only used for determining difficulty to use wands, staffs and rods, but also for determining out of depth.

What this means is (for instance) that !rMana that start appearing at L15 (A:80:15 to 100) have a level for determining OOD of 25. This means that level-feelings get an enormous boost due to the fact that several objects are common before becoming OOD with this calculation.

I guess this was an unintentional (recent?) change. If you want to keep the levels for device failures etc, you could always use the allocation min-depth for OOD ratings. Or you could just revert the behaviour a bit and make the W-entry equal the min-allocation one.

As said, I might just understand how this works wrongly and/or this might be intentional.

I'll make a ticket for this one as well.

Edit: One other thing I've been wondering about is why it's so common with max level for allocation often set to 100 instead of 127. I never play after winning, but I do know that some do and I can't see the reason for setting the default max level at 100. This unless I misunderstands how this works of course.
__________________
It's better to burn out than to fade away!

Last edited by Twilight; August 12, 2010 at 13:33.
Twilight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12, 2010, 13:34   #2
ewert
Knight
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 702
ewert is on a distinguished road
The code ignores >100, anything >100 = 100.

And yeah, the OoD level feelings, if they get it from W, is an oversight, never thought of that.
ewert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 12, 2010, 14:00   #3
Twilight
Apprentice
 
Twilight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sweden
Posts: 58
Twilight is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ewert View Post
The code ignores >100, anything >100 = 100.
Ah ok! That cleared that one up for me. I kind of guessed it was something simple and intentional, since it was kind of strange for something that obvious to be a bug.
__________________
It's better to burn out than to fade away!
Twilight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most OOD object or creature... dhegler Vanilla 30 January 17, 2010 22:37
r1435 unID objects in vendors Zikke Development 3 July 25, 2009 23:02
[FA] Changes to wieldable objects Nick Variants 6 January 22, 2009 06:23
Z240 Question on objects APWhite Variants 0 December 27, 2008 00:13
[Iron] Show flavors for known objects ekolis Variants 5 February 27, 2008 08:54


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:53.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions Inc.