![]() |
#1 |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
![]() |
Dwarven Fencer Smith build viable?
Hello all, hopefully this has not been covered, but in my glances through the forum, I did not see this covered, but if it has, please feel free to link me to it
![]() I am thinking if you took a Naugrim of the House of Nogrod, 0/3/4/4 starting stats. Put 7 points into smithing, 3 points into melee and 4 points into evasion. Take Weaponsmithing, Jewelry, and artistry. This idea had you making a throwing axe that is +1 and .9 lbs and 2 rings of accuracy +2 at the first forge. As you level, you take finesse, subtlety etc. I am not sure if this is viable, or if there is some sort of defect to the throwing axe being wielded by hand or if sub 1 lb axes drop very often (or ever) or any comments. Feel free to criticize or amend anything I have suggested. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Adept
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 165
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Adept
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 165
![]() |
I wonder if maybe a dwarf fencer smith shouldn't use a greatspear? you couldn't take subtlety, but you'd get huge crits, and you could have all the fun of polearm mastery. I'm playing crap-elves right now but if I ever go back to dwarves I might try that build.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
![]() |
I should point out that I am using 1.1.1 since that is what I play on my phone, if that makes a difference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Adept
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 165
![]() |
Yeah, the weight system is different in 1.2, with implications for fencing smiths. I guess I can't really give you advice then. Trying to fence with a 2d4 weapon is still probably a bad idea regardless.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Adept
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 165
![]() |
Looking at it, 13 smithing skill means you can make a 4 lbs +1 acc greatspear, or a 3 lbs normal one (and then you wouldn't have to buy artistry, at least for the first forge)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3
![]() |
So with the spear, the damage range is so high, that you don't worry about having str add sides? if the weight reduces the number of crits, you don't mind as much since you do so much with each multiple? I must apologize as I am a bit ignorant of how using spears can be optimized.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Adept
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 165
![]() |
Quote:
With a 3lbs greatspear and finesse, you do 1d13 extra damage per 9 you go over the target number, or about .78 damage per point. With a 1lbs shortsword, finesse, and subtlety, you do 1d7 extra damage per 5 you go over the target number, or .8 damage per point. They're very comparable, and the greatspear has the advantage that you don't have to buy subtlety and that it does higher base damage. One major advantage the shortsword has, though, is that it does more total criticals, which is important for Cruel Blow and for the morale effects. Also, you're more likely to find an appropriate magical/masterwork/artifact shortsword as loot than to find a similar greatspear. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Adept
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 165
![]() |
I guess the greatspear has -1 acc compared to the shortsword unless you buy polearm mastery, which eliminates the advantage of not having to take subtlety. But polearm mastery also gives you a useful ability, so it's still somewhat in the greatspear's favor.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Knight
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 710
![]() |
I encourage all fencer and polearm builds, but average bonus damage per skill point is misleading as critical hits come in discrete units. With subtlety there are simply more of them leading to more average damage, even if numbers are close when you hit the critical hit exactly without "wasting" points in the roll.
The whole point of 0 strength / 0.9 lb for fencers is not the slightly increased critical hits compared to 1 lb, it is subtlety+rapid attack without penalties. You can simply not do a spear build based on rapid attack not affecting average damage. That is why there is no intrinsic reason, other than the challenge, to make a 0 strength polearm character. When starting 0 strength chars as fencers I found it useful to make a glaive at the first forge until I got sufficient accuracy and subtlety to do damage that way. You do not have to build the whole character at the first forge. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To smith or not to smith? | tmoiynmwg | Sil | 13 | April 29, 2014 02:32 |
graceful smithing (for the singing smith) | taptap | Sil | 13 | March 24, 2014 15:07 |
Dwarven Warrior in 3.3.0 | Eli | Vanilla | 19 | January 29, 2013 16:41 |
Drakk The Dwarven Warrior | sethos | AAR | 23 | October 18, 2011 03:35 |
That damned smith! | diggerB | Vanilla | 9 | October 9, 2010 21:26 |