![]() |
#1 |
Knight
|
Removal suggestions
Removal suggestion 1: Angels
I never quite got the link between Angband and Angels ingame, perhaps it would be wise to drop those religious creatures out of the game, in order to creep closer to the "middle-earth feel"? I know some of you will say: if we drop those then we need to drop these and those also. But right now, I can only think of those with a religious link within the game, everything else that is non-angband is either brought in from myths or the like.
__________________
http://www.rpgartkits.com/ Fantasy art kits for personal and commercial use. Commercial use requires a Developer license, also available through my website. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Prophet
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Climbing up from hole I just dug.
Posts: 4,096
![]() |
Quote:
OTOH your point them not being Tolkenian monsters is a valid one, and many variants have replaced them with Ainur. I would have nothing against changing angels to ainur. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Knight
|
Yeah, replacing them would work better than a pure removal I guess.
Quote:
__________________
http://www.rpgartkits.com/ Fantasy art kits for personal and commercial use. Commercial use requires a Developer license, also available through my website. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Prophet
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Madison, Wisconsin, US
Posts: 3,023
![]() |
Quote:
Gabriel and Azriel are also very interesting. Azriel, is the 2nd most likely cause of death for me, right behind drolem. Uriel is just another fire based unique, like Lernean hydra, phoenix, vargo, gothmog, and lungorthin. He's the least interesting angel by far. So I would greatly oppose removing the angels. However, I don't care at all if they're renamed. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Knight
|
Who would have the powers/authority to decide to permanently rename the various angelic creatures in Angband, into something more inline with Tolkien?
__________________
http://www.rpgartkits.com/ Fantasy art kits for personal and commercial use. Commercial use requires a Developer license, also available through my website. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Adept
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 116
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Knight
|
Ok then, outside of this game, we agree to disagree regarding angels. Let's keep the discussion within Angband.
__________________
http://www.rpgartkits.com/ Fantasy art kits for personal and commercial use. Commercial use requires a Developer license, also available through my website. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Adept
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 141
![]() |
I've become fond of the angels, and vote to keep them as they are. Angband isn't as much Tolkein as a strange mash-up between D&D, Tolkein, and whatever else we felt like putting in -- I don't think they damage thematic consistency worse than anything else, and I like how they present a unique challenge.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Prophet
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Climbing up from hole I just dug.
Posts: 4,096
![]() |
Quote:
While angband is currently developed by a team, he is (or at least should be) the one with the power to make decisions. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Adept
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 116
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
TERM_XTRA_NOISE, candidate for removal. | CJNyfalt | Development | 0 | July 19, 2011 12:06 |
My un suggestions | Adley | Variants | 14 | December 12, 2010 17:50 |
suggestions/enhancements | fbas | Development | 19 | October 31, 2010 00:24 |
Improvement suggestions? | dhegler | Vanilla | 4 | November 4, 2009 04:10 |
Suggestions for my next char? | NeoWizard | Vanilla | 5 | January 22, 2009 22:12 |