Angband.oook.cz
Angband.oook.cz
AboutVariantsLadderForumCompetitionComicScreenshotsFunniesLinks

Go Back   Angband Forums > Angband > Vanilla

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 8, 2021, 14:31   #11
Selkie
Swordsman
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: London
Posts: 356
Selkie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sphara View Post

@selkie
The game I just saved has had typical 'this-can-only-happen-to-me' whining scenario. Game has produced Light Crossbow of Accuracy but not a single bolt from start to this moment. It also produced 10 pebbles of slay evil early but not a single Sling yet. And finally some unique dropped 37 arrows of wounding +17dam, but the game hasn't generated a single bow after that

Those missing pieces will drop eventually, but as far as launchers go, I've been going smh all the way so far. Character just cannot carry a +0 longbow in ironman game just for the fact that some great arrows MIGHT drop.
Weirdly when you play as a rogue especially, you can do more damage throwing shots and pebbles than you can do with a vanilla sling
Selkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8, 2021, 14:33   #12
Sphara
Swordsman
 
Sphara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Finland
Posts: 453
Sphara is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selkie View Post
Weirdly when you play as a rogue especially, you can do more damage throwing shots and pebbles than you can do with a vanilla sling
This I have noticed. I do not carry unenchanted slings anymore.
Sphara is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8, 2021, 16:04   #13
Julian
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 89
Julian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Selkie View Post
Weirdly when you play as a rogue especially, you can do more damage throwing shots and pebbles than you can do with a vanilla sling
This feels like a bug to me.
Julian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8, 2021, 21:48   #14
Nick
Vanilla maintainer
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 56
Posts: 9,169
Donated: $60
Nick will become famous soon enoughNick will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian View Post
This feels like a bug to me.
Yes, it does to me too, but I haven't got around to working out how to fix it.
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
Nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 8, 2021, 23:31   #15
backwardsEric
Adept
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 218
backwardsEric is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick View Post
Yes, it does to me too, but I haven't got around to working out how to fix it.
Something like,

Code:
dmg *= 20 + (5 * missile->weight - 35) / 6;
dmg /= 10;
for the non-O thrown damage formula would make damage from shots a bit less than they would be with an unenchanted sling (for unenchanted iron shots the possible results would be 1, 3, 5, and 7 for an average of 4 versus 2, 4, 6, and 8 for an average of 5). Thrown daggers and spears would also suffer (2.4x and 5.5x multipliers versus the current 3x and 6x) while thrown hammers would remain the same.
backwardsEric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 9, 2021, 03:24   #16
Julian
Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 89
Julian is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick View Post
Yes, it does to me too, but I haven't got around to working out how to fix it.
A lower multiplier for thrown items that aren’t throwing weapons?
Julian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 9, 2021, 06:23   #17
will_asher
DaJAngband Maintainer
 
will_asher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,124
Donated: $10
will_asher is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julian View Post
A lower multiplier for thrown items that aren’t throwing weapons?
Iron shots are considered throwing weapons in the code. Seems like an easy solution to me (if you think it needs fixing). Just remove the THROWING flag from iron shots.
__________________
Will_Asher
aka LibraryAdventurer

My old variant DaJAngband:
http://sites.google.com/site/dajangbandwebsite/home (defunct and so old it's forked from Angband 3.1.0 -I think- but it's probably playable...)
will_asher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12, 2021, 20:23   #18
Thraalbee
Knight
 
Thraalbee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 666
Thraalbee is on a distinguished road
Ironman is certainly viable in 4.2.3.

You can't expect to have all the luck this character had, but the drops were balanced enough through the game - I neither had a shortage nor an abundance of escapes, healing and decent ammo. The balance feels ok. (note: I may look overstocked after the final fight but that's because I didn't use a single !*heal* or !Life in the entire game, a first, and only a few !healing. Emergency activation and mushrooms were very helpful to conserve consumables until I found my first _healing (of two in total).

http://angband.oook.cz/ladder-show.php?id=24674&ok
Thraalbee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14, 2021, 01:27   #19
Evilpotatoe
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: France
Posts: 22
Evilpotatoe is on a distinguished road
Thanks for your answers
And special mention for Thraalbee's nice demonstration :)

I guess I'll give a new try to the latest version, with disabled recall and stairs, of course...
I still doubt it will be as noob-friendly as "modern games", where I expect to quickly win some runs on low difficulty just to get familiar with the mechanics, before I use more serious settings... but it deserves some tries.
personal "Skill" note : my hall of fame reminds me I won 4.1.3 not only with a lvl48 High elf ranger, but also as a lvl46 Dunadan paladin and a lvl50 dwarf warrior). I also did win some Z/Heng runs.


Anyway,
I'm not much surprised to see the players (still here) like things the way they are (else, they would be gone, -- like I (more or less) am --, right ? :)
But if I came back here to post, it's because I realized the reason I stopped to play was the ability to reroll levels.

While I've been pretty happy with the "it's possible !" part & given advices of answers (up to a nice char dump !), I was a bit disappointed by the lack of arguments when it comes to saying it "should not be" the defaut option... "because it shouldn't".
I'm not suggesting something harder (it's the opposite), but something with a better balance, less repetitive tasks, and more challenging choices !
Difficulty options should remain, of course, but I think the default should be "average" (read : easy to win for an experienced player), with noobie & veteran options to ease or spice things up...

I'm not expecting everyone to agree with my opinion, but I really do think some great (and well-playtested) concepts, like the finite dungeon, should be imported in this game, making it more interesting and appealing.
And since I love most of the choices made in Vanilla (cleaning of the codebase !, rebalancing stuff/monsters...), I'm overall quite confident, whatever happens-or-not of this suggestion/discussion

Quote:
"I prefer on-the-spot inventory management vs. filling houses of kit and constant reshuffling for optimal setup"
Fully agree.
This is one of the reason for my suggestion.
As a retired Hengband player, I often ended-up with my 20 pages of home not beeing enough... so much stuff for "shuffling" looks like a very wrong direction to take for me, now.
I know no one is forced to use it, of course, but I tend to try "optimizing" as much as I can, and since it is allowed, doesn't really has any in-game cost, and improves your chances of winning, I somehow "have to" overuse it.

Quote:
"We don't typically talk about ironman play because it is not the norm and those setting are considered challenge settings. So taking the non-normal settings and making them default does not make sense, regardless of how other roguelike games are structured."
Strongly disagree.
Okay, "Ironman" is a keyword for "extra challenge"... but I precised I actually meant "no recall/upstairs". Maybe I should just have talked of "finite ressources" and getting rid of level-scumming then ?
Taking a good or bad setting in or out of the default ones perfectly makes sense to me.
Didn't this happen several times already ? (With preserve mode, no_sell, runes, or whatever else... ? Well, I'm not *band-history aware enough...)

Anyway, it's all a matter of balance, and what I'd like is the game beeing well balanced (even for non-expert players), and not requiring to abuse of exploits (or similarly, floor-scumming) to get serious chances of winning.
In case my initial post wasn't clear enough about this, I think the game could disallow recall/upstairs, but have better drops, more shops in dungeons, etc. instead



I think "easy" difficulty options should make the game pretty easy (and more importantly, forgiving) for noobs. Not turn it into a grinding contest.
On the other hand, hardcore options should grant experienced players real challenges (birth_no_artifacts anyone ^^ ?), and Angband could probably use even more of them.

I don't quite get the point of still allowing -- by default-- to skip dangerous situations and challenging decisions with the ability to regenerate levels until they satisfy one's safety or reward requirements.
Having to cope with what you get and weight things like risks of getting killed in some level vs the risk of getting short of good loot seems much more important to me than requiring sheer patience.
I'm not a freaking borg !

Even keeping this as an "easy" birth option wouldn't look much relevant to me : couldn't better ones be added, like an increase in drop rates of healing or escaping stuff, a faster XP gain, a bigger HP pool multiplier... ?


@Nick : would you mind sharing your point of view please ?

Last edited by Evilpotatoe; October 14, 2021 at 01:33.
Evilpotatoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14, 2021, 01:46   #20
Nick
Vanilla maintainer
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 56
Posts: 9,169
Donated: $60
Nick will become famous soon enoughNick will become famous soon enough
My understanding is that one of Angband's principal principles is it doesn't tell the player what to do.

Options like forced descent and no recall (which together make ironman) are in a sense unnecessary - as a player, you could choose never to take upstairs or use recall, and the effect would be identical.

I think your statement
Quote:
I know no one is forced to use it, of course, but I tend to try "optimizing" as much as I can, and since it is allowed, doesn't really has any in-game cost, and improves your chances of winning, I somehow "have to" overuse it.
is the key one here, and is for some people the down-side to not being told what to do.

So my philosophy is there is more to gain by allowing the player free rein than not, and so the default will be to give the player maximum freedom (note that I'm not sure if defaulting to no selling contradicts this ).

That said, note that there's also the persistent levels option, which you may find interesting in some combination with forced descent and no recall, as well as various numbers you can tweak in constants.txt (stair skip, for example).
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
Nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ironman scumming


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shouldn't Brodha be Eeeevil? Ancient Yeek Vanilla 0 August 31, 2021 12:09
Digging by default droof Vanilla 10 December 11, 2016 17:19
Playable Race Request Lord Fell Vanilla 36 May 1, 2013 19:12
tiles by default dos350 Vanilla 63 September 16, 2012 00:01
@ shouldn't sense scrolls titles when blind fph Vanilla 10 May 7, 2010 21:49


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:06.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.