Angband.oook.cz
Angband.oook.cz
AboutVariantsLadderForumCompetitionComicScreenshotsFunniesLinks

Go Back   Angband Forums > Angband > Variants

View Poll Results: What sort of wilderness do you like (see OP for details)
No Wilderness 8 21.62%
Single Level (Scaled Up) Wilderness 5 13.51%
Multiple Level (Grid Based) Wilderness 6 16.22%
Abstract Wilderness 5 13.51%
Grid Based Wilderness with Connected Dungeons 13 35.14%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 5, 2010, 12:25   #1
Dean Anderson
Adept
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 157
Dean Anderson is on a distinguished road
So - what are your thoughts on wilderness?

Some variants have introduced wilderness to the game. Usually this also involves multiple towns and multiple dungeons.

There seem to be a few ways of doing this that I can think of...

0) There is no wilderness. You have one town above one dungeon and that's it!

1) Wilderness is done at a different scale. There's a single wilderness "level" which contains many towns and/or dungeons. When you enter one of those (like entering a shop in the town level), the scale switches back to normal. I seem to remember a couple of old variants (Kamband? Kangband?) using this style of wilderness.

2) Wilderness is done at the same scale as the dungeon/town. There are multiple wilderness levels arranged in a grid and you go from one to the next by walking off the edge. Each town takes up an entire grid to itself. However, dungeons are not done that way. Each dungeon is a stand-alone stack of levels beneath a grid location. My old Cthangband worked like this (although it also had towers going up in some locations as well as dungeons going down).

3) Wilderness is abstracted. There are multiple wilderness "locations" - some of which are towns and some of which are dungeon entrances - but they are not directly connected in an edge-to-edge manner. Instead, when you choose to leave one you are given a choice of which one to go to, and you are sent directly there. You may have a chance of a random "encounter" on the way, in which case you'll be placed in a small randomly generated outdoor "level" with the monster or monsters. I don't know any roguelike that does this, although it's done by a couple of non-roguelike games.

4) Wilderness is done in a grid manner as in option 2, but the grid is fully 3d. This means that you can - for instance - go down from the town to level 3 of the dungeon, move horizontally from level 3 beneath the town to level 3 beneath the wilderness, and then come back up and arrive in a wilderness level. With this method, each location in the grid has a maximum and minimum dungeon depth and you may need to travel underground to get to where you want to go. I don't know any game that does this.

So what do you guys think? Are wildernesses a good idea? Do they make the game more interesting, or are they a tedious obstacle?
Dean Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5, 2010, 12:44   #2
Philip
Knight
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Prague,Czech Republic
Posts: 909
Philip is on a distinguished road
I'm a purist. Vanilla and O are my favourite variants. Wilderness just screws the game up as far as i am concerned, cause then you have more dungeons and it all snowballs until it's unplayable.
Philip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5, 2010, 13:28   #3
NotMorgoth
Adept
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 216
NotMorgoth is on a distinguished road
I voted for no wilderness; the only variant I have played a lot with wildernesses was TOME 2.x and I didn't particularly like all the moving around between different towns and dungeons.
NotMorgoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5, 2010, 14:01   #4
Slonk
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 18
Slonk is on a distinguished road
I voted for option 5. I'm currently playing FA, and I really like the addition and flavor of the wilderness and multiple towns/dungeons.
Slonk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5, 2010, 15:39   #5
buzzkill
Prophet
 
buzzkill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 2,939
Donated: $8
buzzkill is on a distinguished road
I like wilderness in variants that have it, but don't miss it in variants that don't. Case and point is FA, where I don't see myself ever playing the no-wilderness mode. I'd love to see a bit of 'option 4' added to FA. Horizontal underground movement would be cool.

However, I like the Z+ implementation of wilderness the best. Many terrain types and roads leading places, randomly generated (I think). There is no switching of scale or screen when entering a town, and no switching of screen on the main map ever! This means that monsters can chase you... and chase you... all the way back to town if you last that long. Towns are part of the wilderness, just walled off to prevent monsters from entering. Dungeons are handled in the typical style, staircase down = new level (new screen).
__________________
www.mediafire.com/buzzkill - Get your 32x32 tiles here. UT32 now compatible Ironband and Quickband 9/6/2012.
My banding life on Buzzkill's ladder.
buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5, 2010, 17:11   #6
Derakon
Prophet
 
Derakon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,024
Derakon is on a distinguished road
Generally speaking, I find wilderness to not be as interesting as dungeons, exploration-wise. I don't think that means that the concept of wilderness is flawed; just that the implementations I've tried so far are. A few thoughts:

1) If there's only one scale and no greater wilderness map, then I can get completely lost and unable to find any towns -- no good.
2) Wilderness as multiple stitched-together 4x4 zones means that stepping across an arbitrary point respawns all enemies, which lends itself to scumming dangerous wilderness zones for experience.
3) If the player is expected to return to a town after having left it earlier in the game, then the towns should be relatively easy to backtrack to. Lots of mashing run is not much fun.
4) If the wilderness is large, it needs to be easy UI-wise to cover large distances. I recall from way back when I last played Cthangband hitting 478478478478 to head in a NW direction despite the trees in the way that are blocking running.
Derakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 5, 2010, 18:09   #7
Whelk
Adept
 
Whelk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 200
Whelk is on a distinguished road
I've always been a fan of wilderness, whether as an alternative to the dungeon or as a means of traveling from one town/dungeon to another. It adds a lot of flavor and gives a feeling of scale, as well as a fun sense of exploration. That said, it can be nice to go back to Vanilla where you just have one town, the dungeon, and that's it for the sake of simplicity. I'm glad both are around.

I voted for 3D grid wilderness. That would be awesome.

I love the wilderness in FA where you can find things like buildings, camps and the like out there, sometimes filled with better-than-average treasure.

I don't think wilderness ever becomes too much of an obstacle or tedium as long as Word of Recall is done right.
Whelk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6, 2010, 02:25   #8
Mangojuice
Z+Angband Maintainer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 318
Mangojuice is on a distinguished road
One of the flaws in V is that there's nothing to explore.

What I mean by that is, of course you explore the dungeon, but in a sense, learning the dungeon is totally irrelevant because as soon as you leave the level, it's gone. It's a whole other element to the game and if it's done right, it enhances things.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Z+Angband: A Zangband evolution
http://tinyurl.com/5pq2bd
Mangojuice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6, 2010, 03:56   #9
Nick
Vanilla maintainer
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 8,400
Donated: $60
Nick will become famous soon enough
I voted multi-level grid based, because that's closest to what FA is, so I felt kind of obliged to.

Funnily enough, before I started FA I didn't like wilderness, and I had to put a lot of thought in to get it the way I wanted it. And I'm still not sure I'm entirely happy with it.
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
Nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6, 2010, 05:40   #10
will_asher
DaJAngband Maintainer
 
will_asher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 927
Donated: $10
will_asher is on a distinguished road
I can't stand playing variants with wilderness. The dungeon is where the game happens.

I do intend to try playing FA sometime soon but I'll play no-wilderness mode.
__________________
Will_Asher

Play DaJAngband:
http://sites.google.com/site/dajangbandwebsite/home
will_asher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Un 0.64 thoughts Therem Harth Variants 13 November 14, 2010 17:47
Heng wilderness Sirridan Variants 3 May 26, 2010 00:25
My thoughts on 3.1.1 TJS Vanilla 2 August 14, 2009 04:20
3.1.0 thoughts TJS Vanilla 11 January 15, 2009 16:39
FAangband wilderness survival tips? Donald Jonker Variants 6 December 16, 2008 20:17


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:42.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.