![]() |
#381 |
PosChengband Maintainer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 702
![]() |
Powers aren't the issue. Hengband already has support for these via the Imitator and Blue Mage classes (though I'm not happy with the way the code is written). Essentially, all you need is a mapping from monster race flags to code that is already written, and this is easy to do.
Ditto with resistances and things like free action. Speed bonus could be calculated from already existing r_info data (Something like anything up to +5 is free and the balance is prorata level). Body types require more work, but I was thinking of just using the display character for this (e.g. 'Z' maps to hound body types, etc). This might be a lot of work, but then again, perhaps not. Many monster types will just use the default body type. Innate attacks? OK, just map monster blow info. This will require new code, but should not be hard. Some monsters should not offer innate attacks, though. For example, 'p' type monsters. So all of that can be done without any r_info changes. However, I'd really like the current body to also affect player stats and skills. And for this, alas, I think I actually will roll thru r_info to add data, though 0 defaults might be OK for many monsters. (Example: Possessing a Greater Titan should give massive bonus to Str, penalty to Dex, huge increase in melee skill, but terrible stealth). As for possessing uniques: We'll cross that bridge when we get there. I think I will make it so uniques no longer automatically drop corpses unless they are wanted. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#382 | ||
Adept
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 35
Posts: 240
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#383 | |
Adept
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 204
![]() |
Quote:
Posessors have a VERY high death rate at level 1/no-body, but once you get them started and grind for consumables, they advance okay. I imagine endgame is as powerful as the easy races. Edit: Scrawny cat is the only townie worth considering killing. 1 charge MM for lots of stealth, a weak attack, a few more HPs. Dont wear armor at first, you want to be able to deincarnate and run to survive. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#384 |
PosChengband Maintainer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 702
![]() |
Help me out with Possessor Rules:
[1] Player picks a normal race and this choice effects their xp penalty. But they only get racial stat adjustments, skill adjustments and powers when they are *not* possessing another body. When possessing, their race will list the current body, and they will gain powers and abilities based on that form instead. [2] Player cannot possess a new form until they leave their current form. Dispossessing a form has a very high chance of destroying that body. [3] Possessing a new form can fail, depending on player level vs the new form's level. If it fails and the new form is a unique, there is a chance the new body gets destroyed. Like I said, I haven't really played possessors before, so I am unsure how other variants have handled these sorts of things. Thoughts? EDIT (Based on previous post which I just read): -OR- [1] Possessor is a racial choice. Class is monster. The default body is a "Soul" that is a weak incorporeal, pathetic little ghost in search of a body. I like this better, actually. But I'm curious why all the TOME dumps are Death Mold Possessors (i.e., there is a racial choice). Help! ![]() Last edited by chris; August 14, 2013 at 22:17. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#385 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,372
![]() |
Quote:
That would kill any interest in Possessors whatsoever for me. Maybe that has to do with the way Possession is set up in ToME 2.x where it's only the corpses who have enough HP (which you "take over" as a Possessor) and equipment slots you care about. In particular the equipment slots tend to dominate the experience of being a Possessor. It's basically only unique corpses that have the golden combination of enough HP and enough arms. Having multiple arms is a Big Deal in *bands. EDIT: Just noticed "unless they are wanted". That would basically mean that either players startscum until $DESIRED_UNIQUE is wanted or don't care about possessing uniques (which would ruin the class for me; see above). Neither seems like a good option to me given that all *bands derived from Hengband are already prone to start-scumming. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#386 |
Vanilla maintainer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 8,677
Donated: $60
![]() |
This seems best to me. IIRC Pos did it very similarly to this.
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#387 | |
Adept
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 35
Posts: 240
![]() |
Quote:
[1] Possessors could just start with a (possessed) Player body (can be destroyed when failed to posses). You would be a crappy warrior when you started, like a rogue without stealth and spell. [2] In TOME the "soul" you would be between bodies had 1hp no equipment slots. So you had to be 100% sure you were safe. [3] In TOME you could even find an artifact Player body which couldn't be destroyed when possessing it failed. So you would always have a corpse you can return to when you fail to posses that GWoP destroying the corpse (you did need to carry it with you). But this was still very dangerous to do, same with carrying a corpse as an Ancient dragon wasn't 4.0lbs but more like 500lbs. You would be slow as hell carrying them around. So finding the time and place to posses a corpse was crucial. Making it a monster race makes sense, or else I would just start with the most crappy race so I would have a very low xp penalty. Why start as a Demigod when you won't get the benefits of one? (Or get OP stuff like Death Molds) I hope this all made a bit of sense, it's late. (I just copied everything I know about tome possessing.) *edit* Some more explaining |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#388 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,372
![]() |
To add to Arjen's explanation: In ToME 2.x it isn't actually the act of possessing a body which destroys corpses, it's leaving a body (for the purposes of possessing another one) which does. As long as you have the corpse of your desired body you are guaranteed to be able to possess it. For common monsters getting a body doesn't usually present any problem, you just have to kill enough of them. If you want the body of a unique monster you'd either need to pump the Corpse-preservation skill ridiculously high or just get lucky. (You can actually get two shots at the uniques through an artifact scroll which brought all unique monsters back from the dead, but I digress.)
Pushing Corpse-preservation very high means that lots of corpses litter the dungeon which can get extremely annoying (TMJ). If I ever get around to it, this should probably really be a toggle-able skill so that you can choose when to use your Corpse-preservation skill. There is another mechanic which is highly dangerous for possessors, namely that overexertion (casting the body's spells without enough mana) will cause a "system shock" which forces you out of your current body with 1 HP -- potentially without leaving the corpse behind. Usually that means instant death. (Wearing a cursed item will prevent leaving the body, but still reduces HP to 1.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#389 |
Scout
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 39
![]() |
Off topic. So very sorry.
I don't want to derail the Possessor train, but I have one more question about the Death Sword monster class.
Every level up, you gain a plus to hit or damage. As far as I know, there isn't any way to otherwise increase those numbers. But one nasty fight with a "disenchanter [anything]" and your body is suddenly and permanently stripped of some, most, or ALL of those plusses. Beyond farming for the very rare disenchantment resistance, which isn't a 100% guarantee, is there any other way to avoid this fate? 1) Don't even suggest 'avoid the monsters' because I've had a Dis. Beast summoned right next to me while confused and unable to escape. 2) Should monsters even be able to disenchant your body? Its an intrinsic party of your class. It'd hate to play a rogue whose stealth could be permanently reduced by a type of elemental attack. (Though one would imagine a rogue just set ablaze would lose their stealth at least until they were extinguished.) 3) Does 'disenchantment' do any damage or is it simply meant to wreak havoc on a normal character's gear? Should a Death Sword start off partially or fully resistant to this attack as they are a gearless class? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#390 | |
PosChengband Maintainer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 702
![]() |
Quote:
![]() [1] For everybody, disenchantment may mess up player equipment, removing pluses and even pvals on occasion. [2] For everybody, disenchantment may "disenchant" the player by removing one or more temporary buffs (Things like haste self, double resistance, heroism, blessed, etc). [3] For the Death-Sword, disenchantment may also mess up player equipment, but this is just the current weapon form. You won't lose pvals this way, but may lose pluses to hit and damage. Note these can be repaired using a town service (in the Fighter's Hall) or with a scroll (*Enchant Weapon*), but only up to a point (+12 max). [4] For the Death-Sword, disenchantment may also drain absorbed essences. This will happen from time to time, and is simply part of the game, balancing out the Death-Sword's incredible end game power. Of course, you can repair this by just absorbing more stuff, or by having so many essences absorbed that the drain doesn't cause you to lose anything. Early on, though, I would run from those dwarves! [5] Disenchantment resistance reduces the odds of all of these effects, but does not provide immunity with just a single source. Generally, two sources of disenchantment resistance will give immunity, except for [4] which requires quite a bit more. Like I said, this is the great bane of the Death-Sword! HTH |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Announce] NPPAngband 6.0.0 | nppangband | Variants | 34 | December 15, 2012 03:15 |
Announce: NPP 0.5.3 | nppangband | Variants | 1 | September 18, 2011 18:27 |
Announce: FayAngband 1.0 | Mikko Lehtinen | Variants | 73 | June 20, 2011 12:10 |
Gumband 2.3.1 Announce | rdanhenry | Variants | 35 | May 22, 2009 07:16 |
Announce: DaJAngband v1.0.03 | will_asher | Variants | 4 | February 6, 2008 21:23 |