![]() |
#591 |
Prophet
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Madison, Wisconsin, US
Posts: 3,023
![]() |
I got an ironman hobbit rogue to the midgame. My first attempt died do to misclicking and stepping on a trap on a dungeon level before 10. The trap summoned 5 uniques and phase wasn't enough to avoid death. (Should summon traps really be that deadly?)
Here are my thoughts. The early game for priests can be kind of brutal. Running into an OoD monster (like grip or fang) on dlevel 1 is usually a death sentence. In fact unless you are playing a strong class, it can be quite hard to kill anything until you get bless online. I would recommend having priests automatically start with bless, or if preferred, making bless the only level 1 spell. (I'd also lower the mp cost to 1). Priests have a tough time with non-evil monsters, especially fast moving ones like cats. In the past this was mostly ok, because you got portal around level 7. But portal is now in a dungeon book and this makes the early-midgame very hairy. (In normal games you just buy _Tele, so maybe this is still ok) I would recommend giving priest a survival spell early. Something like hold monster or scare monster might be good enough. But if you wanted to be more flavorful, you could imagine a spell called "pacify" which is a single, smite target (ball radius 1) spell that causes any non-evil monster to be healed to full health and fall asleep with max sleep. Orb of draining is super powerful, but I think a priest spell that devastates undead/demons would be a very flavorful addition and would prevent them from being one trick ponies. Something like "bolt of holiness" which only affects undead and does a healthy dose of damage to undead and demons would be a nice addition. It would be in the town books and maybe unlocked at level 20-25 or so. Dispel Evil and Dispel Undead are both too costly and too inefficient to be anything but mop-up spells in the late game. They have no business being in the town books I think. The pointy penalty is still annoying and frustrating. It seems to me that this is a good candidate to remove when doing a major class rebalance. I greatly miss having access to detect doors and stairs and sense surroundings. There were many levels where I had to explore more than 2/3 of the level before finding a stairs. I had an especially frustrating cavern level, where I had to backtrack through the whole level to find the one stairs, since I was stuck with radius one light. (The cavern and labyrinth levels really need to be either redesigned or removed. They are not fun.) I also miss (slightly) having upgraded bless spells that don't wear off after so few turns. These spells (holy chant and prayer) were problematic and somewhat pointless in the old version, but maybe we can improve them somehow. Another spell I miss is resist heat and cold. This was a very important spell for a low-hp class. I feel like priests should still have it. Also what happened to cure/slow/neutralize poison? This isn't super important, but getting rid of poison helps a lot to avoid the tedium of waiting out poison so you can rest. I can't cast it yet, but the Heal spell in the first dungeon book is super costly. Maybe this is for the best. If I ever get to the late game, I'll mention how this went. For dungeon books, it might be worth considering how DaJ did book drops. Basically it dropped, book 5, book 6, book 7, etc. and what book that was depended on what class you were playing. So if you got a dungeon book drop it was always for your class. The other dungeon books just didn't show up. Since we have many more book types, I think this would help cut down on clutter. One possible bug in gameplay. call light should light up adjacent walls to stairs. I found that it didn't when I was trying to navigate without wielding a light (I've been having some light problems this game... another thing that only happens in ironman games) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#592 |
Prophet
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,968
Donated: $40
![]() |
Yes. For ironman, you can't plan on meeting early out-of-depth monsters the way you can for ordinary play. There are probably too many things you need to spend extra money on !oil,etc, for the unlikely cases. (And you can't dive as hard either.)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#593 |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 2,431
![]() |
I didn't have much trouble with kitties on the priest (though half-troll has much more hps) but certainly being fast non-evil they end up in melee range before you know they're there. I used phase followed by light beam down the corridor when I met one. They may not be evil but they still don't eat that many orbs. I did however see a kitty pit which probably would of been fatal without portal (I might of been lucky there 650' boldor's drop).
http://angband.oook.cz/ladder-show.php?id=21696 Edit: A half-trolls str means I probably had more toys in backup, I'll maybe try a smaller priest after the druid, though I still haven't played necromancer. hmm. Last edited by wobbly; June 8, 2018 at 09:13. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#594 |
Swordsman
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Saratoga, California (in the midst of Silicon Valley)
Posts: 493
![]() |
I found a tiny bug:
Playing a Half Troll Paladin. I read WoR, then drop all my copies of prayer book one in order to free an inventory slot and pick up some additional loot. While I'm waiting for the recall to kick in, I cast "Bless", using the books on the ground. I then hit "n" to repeat that action until the recall happens. I now hit "n" again (after the recall; standing on the stairs on the surface), and the Bless prayer is cast, even though the book is now M.I.A. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#595 |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 2,431
![]() |
Protected a dump in fox form:
http://angband.oook.cz/ladder-show.php?id=21703 Probably should say fox on it somewhere. The claw & biting is cute by the way |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#596 | |||||||||||
Vanilla maintainer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 8,643
Donated: $60
![]() |
I've now got a priest to CL21, DL19.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As for level design, I haven't really played enough to get a sense. I just had a really fun labyrinth, but it was small - maybe restrict both of those level types in size. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not exactly sure what to do about the proliferation of books thing. I think having the half-casters sometimes getting their own books is good for clarity, but it does create more useless objects. On the other hand, having the other class books around is kind of nice for promoting curiosity about classes you aren't currently playing (for players who haven't played all the classes yet). Quote:
This was all very helpful, thanks. All the new classes are really still fairly rough around the edges, but I feel like progress is being made.
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. |
|||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#597 | |
Swordsman
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 279
![]() |
Quote:
On the book proliferation thing, how about having it so that each class has its own spellbooks, but only two sets of spellbooks are generated per game? For example, say I'm playing as a priest. I'll find my green priest books, and in addition I will find one randomly chosen set of red books. One game, those might be the mage books, next game they might be the rogue books, and so forth. If I were a warrior (and thus had no spellbooks of my own), both sets of books would be randomized. That way, we get the flavor benefits of having unique books for each class, and of people seeing all of the books without actually playing as every class, but there's no increase in junk over previous release versions. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#598 | |
Knight
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 527
![]() |
Quote:
Is there actually a solid case for the retention of wrong-class books in the object generation? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#599 |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: London-ish
Age: 48
Posts: 1,877
![]() |
The new spellbooks are breaking the econony for players that like Angband the way god inteded it to be: with selling enabled.
__________________
"i can take this dracolich" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#600 |
Prophet
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Madison, Wisconsin, US
Posts: 3,023
![]() |
I think the biggest problem with the dispel spells is that they are costed for having strong effects and average damage. If you have 10 monsters in LoS they are reasonably strong. But how often do you have 10 monsters in LoS? Very rarely. A line of ghouls is one of the better scenarios, and spear of light is a better way to take care of it. The second problem is it uses dXX as damage which is horribly inconsistent. I really dislike spell damage that's just a random number between 1 and N, the variance is far too high for my liking. (This goes for monster spells also.) Turn undead was useless because OoD was a far better option, always.
I think the best solution for these spells is for late game efficient clearing. They are costed appropriately for that, but they aren't useful in the dungeon books. I disagree with luneya. The problem is not that the priest needs a mass sleep spell that buys them 1 or 2 turns. In fact the 1-2 turn extra was precisely the problem with the old spells. 1-2 turns does nothing for a monster that moves faster than you. The problem is that they need a single target sleep spell that buys them enough turns to get far enough away so that the cat/hydra/beorn won't wake up and track them down. All groups of non-evil monsters (I think) have pack mentality. And since priests have call light, getting trapped by these groups is more your fault (blink dogs/phase spiders notwithstanding). It's the fast moving single monster that's the issue here. As far as resist heat and cold, I start missing it around the midgame. Which is now for my character. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I'm considering making a new Sil branch | Quirk | Sil | 46 | October 19, 2017 19:27 |
Trap/door feature branch | Nick | Vanilla | 220 | November 15, 2016 09:56 |
Curses feature branch | Nick | Vanilla | 153 | November 14, 2016 21:09 |
svn branch | Pete Mack | Vanilla | 55 | August 16, 2010 11:28 |
feature request: display magic item failure rates | bebo | Vanilla | 5 | February 12, 2009 21:35 |