Angband.oook.cz
Angband.oook.cz
AboutVariantsLadderForumCompetitionComicScreenshotsFunniesLinks

Go Back   Angband Forums > Angband > Development

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old December 1, 2016, 20:38   #10
Nick
Vanilla maintainer
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 52
Posts: 7,022
Donated: $60
Nick is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnate View Post
We have a choice: imperfect algorithmic power, or imperfect simplified power. The same goes for monsters. I don't see the logic of simplifying one but not the other.
I have two arguments for treating monsters and objects differently, one philosophical and one mathematical.

First, the game story is that the character goes into dungeon, aiming to kill Morgoth and as many of his minions as necessary. In order to do this, they need objects. So the fundamental objects of the world are firstly the dungeon, and secondly the monsters - and objects are then a response to those. Your sword of *Slay Dragon* is only made that way because that's what slays dragons. So it makes sense to have monsters (and terrain), and then objects that are constructed relative to them.

Second, if you have two algorithmically constructed sets - object and monsters - which are constructed relative to each other, you lack a fixed point in the system. So objects are made and priced based on their effectiveness against monsters, but then monsters are allocated power based in part on what objects are available to counter them, and the argument becomes circular.

There is also the broader argument that we are trying to construct an increasingly complex algorithm to measure a one-dimensional power or value, when in fact values of objects vary wildly depending on game situation. I think complexity needs to be avoided as much as possible here because:
  • It is hard to understand
  • We start giving its results more credence than they deserve
  • Small changes have unpredictable effects
  • It makes the game rigid

I don't think I have explained my reasoning terribly well here, but I hope it gives some insight to my approach
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
Nick is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why inscribe objects? joelsanda Vanilla 14 October 27, 2011 20:59
You sense the presence of objects! fruviad Vanilla 1 September 7, 2011 18:22
OOD objects too common? Philip Vanilla 50 February 9, 2011 14:58
[FA] Changes to wieldable objects Nick Variants 6 January 22, 2009 06:23
Z240 Question on objects APWhite Variants 0 December 27, 2008 00:13


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.