![]() |
#1 |
Adept
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 136
![]() |
Gnomes do not auto ID rods?
Is there a reason a gnome can auto ID wands and staves, but not rods?
Seems inconsistent to me, but maybe I'm missing something? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Adept
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Adept
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 136
![]() |
Quote:
Nick, Can I submit a pull request to possibly get into the 4.2.2 update? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Adept
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 136
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Adept
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 136
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Vanilla maintainer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 56
Posts: 9,353
Donated: $60
![]() ![]() |
The code to me indicates that this was intentional. Of course that doesn't mean we can't change it. What do others think?
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,077
![]() |
My belief is that rods were excluded to not let the gnome racial ability become too powerfull compared to others, like recognizing mushrooms.
Personally I dont care about balancing the races and I am all for making it consistent. Let gnomes recognize rods, too. On a somewhat related note...identifying all the hundreds of different devices is the most tedious part of the game since rune id has been introduced. Would it be possible to group the devices a little, so that when you have learned the wand of fire ball, the rod of fire ball will be known, too ? Or dragon breath potion - wand. If it does the same, the device type that delivers the effect wouldnt matter. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Prophet
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,677
Donated: $40
![]() |
Why do you bother identifying everything? If i have a staff of no obvious value, i just ignore it, unidentified.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,077
![]() |
By "ignore" do you mean squelch ?
I am a fanatic squelcher; so for example, I will squelch resist heat potions when I have fire immunity and remember to unsquelch when I lose fire immunity again due to changes in gear. Now to determine the usefulness of a staff you need to activate it; and activating once (with a target in LOS) is also what you do to identify (most) staves. So what do you gain by ignoring unidentified ? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Prophet
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,677
Donated: $40
![]() |
Yes, i mean squelch. If i run across a low level staff that seems to do nothing, i *know* it is bot worth carrying.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sky's Checklist Pt. 9 - Gnomes | Sky | AAR | 24 | November 20, 2020 00:59 |
Sangband Idea - replace Gnomes with Petty-Dwarves | NotMorgoth | Variants | 6 | May 16, 2012 18:37 |
Can't recharge Rods | Pete Mack | Vanilla | 9 | January 5, 2010 17:39 |
Macros for rods... | dhegler | Vanilla | 2 | December 16, 2009 17:00 |
Rods of Detection | Larvitz | Vanilla | 6 | January 22, 2009 17:38 |