Angband Forums High-Elf Warrior
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Thread Tools Display Modes
 February 3, 2017, 02:40 #61 PowerDiver Prophet   Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,712 I have no idea whether it is accurate, but I always used +2 to-hit = +1 to-dam as my guideline.
 February 3, 2017, 03:05 #62 Pete Mack Prophet   Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 5,325 Donated: \$40 I just did some math. (The displayed hit probability is hopelessly wrong for the monster info screen.) It depends a lot on your melee skills. Let M = melee skill = base + 3*to_h bonus. AC = monster AC Then hit probability is .12 + (1-.12-.05)* (M - AC*2/3)/M. For M = 120 AC = 150 (roughly a dracolich) you will be hitting 26% - Base 40% - With a +10 accuracy ring (or buffed with !Hero alone) 57% - Buffed with !Hero and !Berserk 62% - With all 3 bonuses So without buffing (Note: not recommended against high AC), your damage improves by .14/.25 = 56%. With heavy buffing, it increase by 9% For a decent midgame damage output of 50 per blow, that corresponds to 26 and 5 damage per blow, respectively. Of course, if you're using Sting or Harradekket, the numbers are much lower. TL;DR: For good melee compared to level appropriate AC, the value is about 2:1 to_d:to_h For poor melee, always choose to_h.
 February 3, 2017, 03:15 #63 PowerDiver Prophet   Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,712 The other thing to keep in mind is that these comparisons are important *only* when facing a serious threat. You simply shouldn't care against lesser opponents.
February 3, 2017, 03:32   #64
Pete Mack
Prophet

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,325
Donated: \$40
With one exception: mage. To conserve mana, you need to fight everything except for the most dangerous monsters. The optimal mage melee weapon is thus a MoD of Gondolin--ie, slay everything you can actually hit. (Of course, you may need a stat stick here.)

Quote:
 Originally Posted by PowerDiver The other thing to keep in mind is that these comparisons are important *only* when facing a serious threat. You simply shouldn't care against lesser opponents.

February 3, 2017, 18:20   #65
PowerDiver
Prophet

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Pete Mack With one exception: mage. To conserve mana, you need to fight everything except for the most dangerous monsters. The optimal mage melee weapon is thus a MoD of Gondolin--ie, slay everything you can actually hit. (Of course, you may need a stat stick here.)
Do such mages ever choose between a ring of damage and a ring of slaying? I think I always use different rings by the time that sort of combat is feasible.

 February 3, 2017, 18:31 #66 Derakon Prophet     Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 8,830 Yeah, mage physical stats are so miserable that they'll almost certainly prefer =STR or =CON over either of those.
 February 3, 2017, 22:01 #67 Pete Mack Prophet   Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 5,325 Donated: \$40 Eddie--if you're a high elf mage using something like Thunderfist(CON, STR) or Deathwreaker (STR), I can see adding a ring of slaying as an option. An extra 40 melee makes a big difference against high-AC targets. Edit: one reason to point this out is that mage hit probability is *significantly* overstated by the 4.0.5 monster knowledge. (Nick is or has fixed it in the rev branch.) If you are considering a fighter mage, focusing on this really helps (along with al three buffs, despite the nerfed Tenser's mages get.) Of course with archery you get a big bonus from additive hit chance of both bow and arrows, so long as you are shooting from relatively nearby. Last edited by Pete Mack; February 3, 2017 at 22:13.
February 4, 2017, 01:01   #68
PowerDiver
Prophet

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Pete Mack Eddie--if you're a high elf mage using something like Thunderfist(CON, STR) or Deathwreaker (STR), I can see adding a ring of slaying as an option. An extra 40 melee makes a big difference against high-AC targets.
If you are using it to save mana, you might want to wear a ring of int. Or con or speed, as death reduces your mana precipitously . In particular, a ring of str+5 generally gives you +5 to hit and +5 dam in addition to possibly another half blow or more. It's really hard for a ring of slaying to match that, and if they are even close sustain str is nothing to sneeze at. I've played a lot of everything, including mages, and I really cannot remember a mage giving slaying or damage serious consideration, ever, except maybe early on before I found a decent stat ring.

Mind you, my memories and experience are mostly for 3.0 with my version of blows code, but I've played some 3.1+, and I think the principles should apply pretty well to 4.0.

 Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Angband     AAR     Vanilla     Development     ToME     Sil     Variants     Competition The real world     Idle chatter     Oook! Obsolete     v4

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Pete Mack AAR 0 February 27, 2016 03:30 Raccoon Vanilla 19 October 22, 2015 16:08 mandos Vanilla 0 June 23, 2012 01:43 ZenDragon AAR 3 December 23, 2009 14:36 CunningGabe Vanilla 2 February 28, 2008 14:30

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:50.

 Contact Us - Angband.oook.cz - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.