![]() |
#1 |
Angband Devteam member
|
Looking for a new game
Hi all,
Felt like reinstalling EU:Rome today - my favourite of all the Paradox 'grand strategy' games. Just wondered if anyone had any more recent recommendations in this genre. I'm looking for a Civ-style game, with grand scope and timeline, but with lots of knobs to twiddle (characters, armies, research etc. etc.). I haven't tried Crusader Kings II yet - I really liked the original, but fear that the new one will be dumbed-down. Any views on CK2 or any other similar large strategy game would be very welcome. Happy xmas/new year all.
__________________
"3.4 is much better than 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3. It still is easier than 3.0.9, but it is more convenient to play without being ridiculously easy, so it is my new favorite of the versions." - Timo Pietila |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Knight
|
Does it have to be a historical strategy game, or do space 4X games count, too?
__________________
You read the scroll labeled NOBIMUS UPSCOTI... You are surrounded by a stasis field! The tengu tries to teleport, but fails! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Angband Devteam member
|
Ooh, space would be fab. The problem I've always found with space games is getting the scale right though. SE5 was way too slow; last really good space games I played were Sword of the Stars (turn-based) and Sins of a Solar Empire (real-time). They were both great fun, but a tiny bit too macro for me (e.g. all ground combat abstracted away). What I really want is a modern-day rewrite of MoO1 ...
__________________
"3.4 is much better than 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3. It still is easier than 3.0.9, but it is more convenient to play without being ridiculously easy, so it is my new favorite of the versions." - Timo Pietila |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Angband Devteam member
|
Hmmm. A bit of browsing turns up a SotS sequel, the unexpectedly-named Sword of the Stars II, and something called Elemental: Fallen Enchantress from Stardock (the makers of Sins). The latter is supposedly the spiritual heir to MoM, or as someone put it "Two parts Civ to one part HoMM". We'll see.
__________________
"3.4 is much better than 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3. It still is easier than 3.0.9, but it is more convenient to play without being ridiculously easy, so it is my new favorite of the versions." - Timo Pietila |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Knight
|
SotS2, despite what you may have heard, is actually pretty good. It was just REALLY, REALLY buggy on the initial release!
__________________
You read the scroll labeled NOBIMUS UPSCOTI... You are surrounded by a stasis field! The tengu tries to teleport, but fails! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 62
![]() |
I thought Crusader Kings 2 was a great game, although I have never played the first one so I can't comment on whether or not it's dumbed down a lot. Either way, I think it's regarded as a solid game by most fans of the genre and I've seen it nominated for game of the year on a few different sites... it may have won also, not sure.
I noticed nobody mentioned Galactic Civilizations 2, which I thought that was an excellent game. I would highly recommend it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Angband Devteam member
|
Quote:
Will try SotS2 and CK2 then. Thanks for the tips.
__________________
"3.4 is much better than 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3. It still is easier than 3.0.9, but it is more convenient to play without being ridiculously easy, so it is my new favorite of the versions." - Timo Pietila |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2
![]() |
While I've never actually played civilization before, there's this awesome game I bought from gog called master of magic. People compare it to civilization though and from what I've seen of civ, they certainly are similar. In master of magic you take control of a wizard trying to take control of the world. Lots of units and spells to research, best turn based strategy I've ever played. No timeline though, its fantasy only. I just wish it would run right on my lousy laptop.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Adept
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 117
![]() |
FreeCiv is nice if you want to try Civilization. It's based on Civ 2 (The best one, IMO), and it's completely free. Plus, you can play a few online games, if you feel confident.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Knight
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 955
![]() |
Quote:
Age of Wonders is nearly a MoM clone. It lacks a bit of I don't know what, that made MoM so special, but it is nevertheless a great game. There was an Age of Wonders II and also a slightly better Age of Wonders: Shadow Magic. All of the Civilization games are great in their own way, some of them have good AddOns or Mods transporting the original game into the far future or fantasy realms. What about Dwarf Fortress? It is by far the most complex city-building/stategy/simulation game ever. Though it is still in early beta state, it is playable by all means and one of the most enjoyable games once you have mastered the learning - eh, cliff. Beeing an ASCII based game there are also a lot of different tile and graphic sets available for DF, and for the lazy newbs there is the Lazy Newb Pack wich comes with a lot of extras and an easy access options window: http://www.bay12forums.com/smf/index.php?topic=59026.0 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My best game every so far...over | Wraitheist | Vanilla | 20 | September 3, 2013 17:59 |
Has anybody seen this game? | Malak Darkhunter | Idle chatter | 4 | November 17, 2011 21:54 |
Close Game | UglySquirrell | AAR | 0 | August 22, 2011 23:47 |
My best game so far... | Wraitheist | Vanilla | 5 | August 21, 2008 20:18 |
My first game of Angband | Icey | Vanilla | 22 | September 2, 2007 20:48 |