![]() |
#111 |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: London-ish
Age: 48
Posts: 1,879
![]() |
curses are seen as egos. this leads to a Ring Of The Dog getting sold for 1800 gp in the market (it's normally a 20 gold item).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#112 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,819
![]() |
http://angband.oook.cz/ladder-show.php?id=20710
Playing with randarts as always, this is the first character with artifacts that are substantial upgrades to ego items, in about 10 who made it to the lategame. 4 of the 12 slots are better: - the ring Eriel is basically a ring of damage with some stats - the Arkenstone is always better due to activation - the armor with 2 attacks - the cap Nelch is a hat of telepathy plus seeing + 5 int In the rest of the slots, the best artifact is either inferior to or of similar level as the ego, and my other characters had either no or maybe 1 useful artifact (apart from the Arkenstone). This would not be a problem except the point of randarts is making unpredictable items that lead to somewhat interesting choices when combined to the endgame set. As it is, this does not happen The story of how this has come to pass, in my view, is as follows: A new distribution by Fizzix led to previously rare egos becoming commonplace, like great weapons of <high ego> or cloaks of the magi. This made vanilla substantially easier. To counter that somewhat, the measure was to (slightly) nerf artifacts - the most powerful items - both the standarts (for example, Sting and Thorin), and, I assume, if the power value was adjusted, also the randarts based on those standarts. This pushed the artifacts down close to egos in power, only barely held above by the synergies of the standart set. The randarts that lack this synergy are typically below the egos. Now if the artifacts were to be improved, this would certainly lead to an "easier" game (again) and more powerfull characters. Difficulty is subjective; however, in my opinion it was a bad idea to try to increase it by tinkering with the artifacts only. If there is to be a meaningfull option to play with items of random properties, I can see various ways to achieve this: - randomize the egos in some way - improve the artifacts; this will lead to powerfull characters and an easy game - nerf the egos and keep the artifacts as is, so you end up using more randarts. I dont know how difficult vanilla should be and I dont really care all that much, but it would be nice if there was a way to play with random items that lead to a variation in setups. It is the only way I want to play vanilla. Playing ten games to get one where 1/3 of the items are different is not that. Last edited by Estie; May 11, 2017 at 03:18. Reason: edit: typo |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#113 |
Prophet
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,832
![]() |
Sleep monster is a big big mess. There are duration values everywhere in the code and the text files and I don't see any coherence in them. The problem is that these values must match monster "sleepiness", so why not simplify the effect by removing the duration and simply affect the timer depending on that value? The corresponding formula is in place_new_monster_one():
Code:
int val = race->sleep; mon->m_timed[MON_TMD_SLEEP] = ((val * 2) + randint1(val * 10));
__________________
PWMAngband variant maintainer - check http://powerwyrm.monsite-orange.fr (or http://www.mangband.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=9) to learn more about this new variant! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#114 |
Prophet
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,832
![]() |
Also for the "wonder" effect (PROJ_MON_CONF).
__________________
PWMAngband variant maintainer - check http://powerwyrm.monsite-orange.fr (or http://www.mangband.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=9) to learn more about this new variant! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#115 | |
Vanilla maintainer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 8,657
Donated: $60
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Thanks for your thoughtful reply.
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#116 | |
Knight
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 958
![]() |
Quote:
Not sure if we should really have higher-level egos with as many bonuses as Holy Avenger etc. anyway, but even just randomising the existing ones so that instead of guaranteed Slay Evil/Undead/Demon and See Invisible you sometimes get one with Slay Animal/Orc/Dragon and Feather Falling would go a long way to making the really useful ones rarer. Or maybe you could free it up even further, and just have a list of allowed traits for each slot, and pick completely randomly from those according to the level of the ego. So for instance, for a given slot you might have allowed lists of "good", "great", and "superb" traits. (Say, for an ego helm, "good" might be a bonus to Infravision or Searching, "great" might be See Invisible or pBlind, and "superb" would be ESP.) A level 1 ego would get a single pick from the "good" list. A level 2 ego would get either two picks from the "good" list or a single pick from the "great" list. A level 3 ego might get one "superb" trait, one "great" + one "good" trait, or three "good" traits. Etc. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#117 |
Knight
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 862
![]() |
Some of the egos actually predate angband and I'd like them to remain simply for continuity purposes. Personally I feel like most of the higher egos are sadly junk compared to artifacts, to the point where even stuff like HA is usually hardly worth condisering.
I would have ego items start appearing sooner so they get a look in vs artifacts. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#118 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,947
Donated: $40
![]() |
Savefiles should be compatible between recent dev versions.
__________________
takkaria whispers something about options. -more- |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#119 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,819
![]() |
http://angband.oook.cz/ladder-show.php?id=20713
It seems there is a good chance that rings pick up the "no melee and bad at casting" flag from rings of escaping, which makes even high randart rings all but useless. This should probably not happen, or be reduced to the extent of badly cursed artifacts. Also I had gauntlets with a curse that gave negative modifier to dexterity; I could remove the curse, but the dex penalty remained. The phial still looks like dark red * edit: unbarring ways now works with trapped chests, great! edit2: or does it ? summoning rune went off this time. Last edited by Estie; May 11, 2017 at 20:08. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#120 | |
Prophet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,024
![]() |
Quote:
The simple fact of the matter is that for weapons, damage is king, and you'll usually find at least one big-damage ego weapon in the game, while randarts are much less reliable. You could "fix" this by restricting the damage output of high-end ego weapons. I believe there's no restrictions currently and indeed that if the game attempts to make an artifact for a weapon type that has no artifacts left (which includes all three of the "big three" weapon types) then it just throws a bunch of +to-hit and +to-dam onto an ego instead. Something like this: Code:
while (ego weapon fails to pass a check to allow it to be more powerful than intended) { weapon to-dam is decreased by 1; } |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bugs and complaints on current master | Nick | Vanilla | 588 | April 27, 2017 23:54 |
Master Thief | Grotug | Idle chatter | 1 | March 27, 2017 00:54 |
Sil 1.1.1 no-artefacts, polearm master | bron | AAR | 21 | August 28, 2013 00:42 |
Artifacts in 3.2 (Master List) | Tregonsee | Vanilla | 8 | March 6, 2011 12:33 |
State of Angband master branch | d_m | Development | 80 | November 26, 2010 15:14 |