March 30, 2009, 12:25
|
#1 |
|
Knight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 657
 |
NOFLAVOR flag ?
The NOFLAVOR flag is used in Angband/64 for objects that have no 'flavor text'. I think that approach may be less 'hackish' than using defines like SV_FOOD_MIN_SHROOM.
__________________
Currently turning (Angband) Japanese. |
|
|
|
March 30, 2009, 13:42
|
#2 | |
|
Angband maintainer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,546
Donated: $40
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm still not adding it as an option... |
|
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2009, 14:44
|
#3 |
|
Knight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 657
|
Completely different subject, but I've just realized that I've fallen foul of the 'armor <> armour' problem.
 Is Vanilla Angband nicely consistent with that, I wonder? 
__________________
Currently turning (Angband) Japanese. |
|
|
|
|
March 30, 2009, 14:48
|
#4 | |
|
Angband maintainer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,546
Donated: $40
|
Quote:
__________________
I'm still not adding it as an option... |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Monster rebalancing (the new -r flag) | ChodTheWacko | Vanilla | 2 | February 2, 2009 13:28 |
| Will we get rid of the 32 bit flag variables? | Bandobras | Vanilla | 18 | December 22, 2007 15:54 |
Linear Mode
