![]() |
#1 |
Knight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 657
![]() |
NOFLAVOR flag ?
The NOFLAVOR flag is used in Angband/64 for objects that have no 'flavor text'. I think that approach may be less 'hackish' than using defines like SV_FOOD_MIN_SHROOM.
__________________
Currently turning (Angband) Japanese. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,845
Donated: $40
![]() |
I think the least hackish way to deal with them would be to make a new sval just for mushrooms, and then there's no need for a flag or the hardcoded indexes.
__________________
"Physician, heal thyself." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Knight
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 657
![]() |
Completely different subject, but I've just realized that I've fallen foul of the 'armor <> armour' problem.
![]() Is Vanilla Angband nicely consistent with that, I wonder? ![]()
__________________
Currently turning (Angband) Japanese. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,845
Donated: $40
![]() |
No, but I tend towards using the British spelling.
__________________
"Physician, heal thyself." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Monster rebalancing (the new -r flag) | ChodTheWacko | Vanilla | 2 | February 2, 2009 12:28 |
Will we get rid of the 32 bit flag variables? | Bandobras | Vanilla | 18 | December 22, 2007 14:54 |