Angband Forums To hit calculation
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 Thread Tools Display Modes
 April 1, 2009, 07:31 #1 takkaria Veteran     Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 1,947 Donated: \$40 To hit calculation I've been fiddling around with my local copy of the game of late and wondering how to make things more fun and make mechanics more discoverable. One thing I think the game is lacking at the moment is an obvious mechanic for the to-hit formula. Luckily, I was playing some second edition D&D the other day and the to-hit mechanic was pretty obvious there, so I'm pretty tempted to import THAC0 into Angband. It would require a big of a rejig, but I think it would make quite a nice fit, and make just what to-hit scores on weapons mean a little more discoverable. I will try and get a patch up here in the next couple of days. In the meantime, discuss. __________________ takkaria whispers something about options. -more-
 April 1, 2009, 07:42 #2 Pete Mack Prophet   Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Seattle, WA Posts: 5,872 Donated: \$40 I think the to_hit formula is pretty simple--no chance, if your to_hit is below 3/4MAC. Linearly increasing chance beyond that point, with a "natural" 5% chance of failure or success. (This is pretty much what I recall from when I played D&D way back in the dark ages.)
 April 1, 2009, 08:25 #3 PowerDiver Prophet   Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 2,712 The pure D&D mechanic means a progression of X * 5% values. That shortens the range over which your skill matters. To make it work, you need to shorten the range of skill. This is related to the discussions of device activation that unfortunately went nowhere. Do you want the player to [fairly quickly] improve to 95% success, and thereafter make no improvement with additional plusses [weapon, stat, or level]? That's where the simpler methods lead. The current system allows unlimited progression. I also think there ought to be a way to convert hit rolls that are way above AC into criticals [rather than the current method I really dislike]. The only strange things currently are the 3/4 multiplier on AC and the 3 multiplier on to-hit. You could just rescale the values in race_info and class_info to use straight AC and convert +to_hit = +to_skill directly, and publish the exact skill number. Make all +to_hit transparent, and the player could compare skill to monster AC to see hit chance directly [could even be included in the monster description]. OK -- currently +4 AC on a monster requires +1 to_hit to offset so I guess all of the monster ACs would have to be rescaled as well, but that's still simple enough.
April 1, 2009, 10:42   #4
Nick
Vanilla maintainer

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 8,560
Donated: \$60
Quote:
 Originally Posted by takkaria One thing I think the game is lacking at the moment is an obvious mechanic for the to-hit formula. Luckily, I was playing some second edition D&D the other day and the to-hit mechanic was pretty obvious there, so I'm pretty tempted to import THAC0 into Angband. It would require a big of a rejig, but I think it would make quite a nice fit, and make just what to-hit scores on weapons mean a little more discoverable. I will try and get a patch up here in the next couple of days. In the meantime, discuss.
Too subtle, I think. Personally, I would have gone with "I'm moving to O combat".
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

April 1, 2009, 11:06   #5
takkaria
Veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,947
Donated: \$40
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Nick Too subtle, I think. Personally, I would have gone with "I'm moving to O combat".
Well, O combat with THAC0 would probably be a compromise solution.

PS. I also want cocaine in the black market.
__________________
takkaria whispers something about options. -more-

April 1, 2009, 11:26   #6
Nick
Vanilla maintainer

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 55
Posts: 8,560
Donated: \$60
Quote:
 Originally Posted by takkaria PS. I also want cocaine in the black market.
Don't we all.
__________________
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.

April 1, 2009, 12:12   #7
PowerDiver
Prophet

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
 Originally Posted by takkaria PS. I also want cocaine in the black market.
Speed isn't enough for you?

April 1, 2009, 12:25   #8
Rizwan
Swordsman

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 292
Quote:
 Originally Posted by PowerDiver Speed isn't enough for you?
Or mushrooms of hallucination?

 April 1, 2009, 17:17 #9 Atarlost Swordsman   Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 441 There's no reason you have to do THAC0 with d20. You could use the same algorithm in 1% increments with simulated d100s. __________________ One Ring to rule them all. One Ring to bind them. One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness interrupt the movie.
April 1, 2009, 18:10   #10
PowerDiver
Prophet

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,712
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Atarlost There's no reason you have to do THAC0 with d20. You could use the same algorithm in 1% increments with simulated d100s.
Makes no difference in the basic problem of a quick progression to 95% and no progress thereafter, which is guaranteed given the huge difference in possible AC values.

The only viable solution I can see is for Takkaria to allow a choice between current style and THAC0, by introducing a new birth option. Make that 2 new options, to allow for both d20 and percentile dice.

 Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Angband     AAR     Vanilla     Development     ToME     Sil     Variants     Competition The real world     Idle chatter     Oook! Obsolete     v4

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post vorondil Vanilla 8 December 20, 2008 20:23 ekolis Vanilla 11 July 15, 2007 01:07 Elsairon Vanilla 6 July 13, 2007 10:51

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03.

 Contact Us - Angband.oook.cz - Archive - Top