Resistances: additive vs boolean

pampl · February 9, 2011, 07:11

I've been thinking about resistances and I'm not sure which of two options is better: the classic Angband system, where you either have/don't have a resistance (complicated slightly with temp resistances and immunities and vulnerabilities), or the approach used by OAngband/EyAngband/FAAngband and most (all?) Diablo-ish games: each resistance on your equipment adds to the net total resistance. That doesn't have to be a percentile figure, e.g. in Torchlight resistance is a straight damage reduction. It's not a completely black-and-white situation, as there are sometimes resistance caps which render any additional resistance pointless- similar to already having a resistance in Angband's true/false system.

I think I prefer Vanilla Angband's system, because the boolean nature of it makes having a resistance vs. having a "hole" a stark difference that clarifies the consequences of equipment decisions. On the other hand, the granularity that's usually present in the additive system means more possible variety. I'm interested to hear all your opinions on it, even though we're probably slightly biased towards Angband's way of doing it

Philip · February 9, 2011, 07:18

I went with the O system because I think it allows for more variety and such, and it allows for more specialization. Have 60% chaos resist? Guess who you're going after.

Storch · February 9, 2011, 08:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philip

I went with the O system because I think it allows for more variety and such, and it allows for more specialization. Have 60% chaos resist? Guess who you're going after.

O system is obviously "better". Anyway I like boolean resistances more because O system tempts me to optimize ad nauseam and makes me perpetually discontent. What I don't like and understand in V system are high resistances - why they are random, why there are arbitrary damage caps etc.

Philip · February 9, 2011, 09:14

Wait a sec. Are we all in agreement or do I just not understand the poll?

Storch · February 9, 2011, 10:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philip

Wait a sec. Are we all in agreement or do I just not understand the poll?

I don't know, I didn't vote :-)

Philip · February 9, 2011, 10:35

OK, now I'm *very* confused, pampl seems to like the Vanilla system, but if I understand correctly I just voted for the O system. Maybe pampl hasn't voted either. To adress pampl's concern for the clear difference between holes and not holes I think it'll be still quite clear.

pampl · February 9, 2011, 13:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philip

OK, now I'm *very* confused, pampl seems to like the Vanilla system, but if I understand correctly I just voted for the O system.

I managed to mis-vote in my own poll. I should have waited until I got some sleep before trying to do such a complicated task

buzzkill · February 9, 2011, 13:18

The additive FA/O system is better. It makes every resistance on every piece of equipment matter. It also provides some 'random' variability (just because you have rBase covered doesn't mean that they are covered equally). Furthermore, you can achieve higher levels of resistance without bothering with potions/spells (V-style double resists).

Philip · February 9, 2011, 13:57

So to set the record clear, it's actually 8-2, right?

pampl · February 9, 2011, 23:25

No doubt it was at the time you wrote it; as of now it's 9-5. Additive resistances are more popular than I would have predicted; I guess I should be considering them more seriously.

View Poll Results: Which kind of resistance is better?
Additive	21	72.41%
Boolean	8	27.59%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

February 9, 2011, 07:11	#1
pampl RePosBand maintainer Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Seattle, WA, USA Posts: 225	Resistances: additive vs boolean I've been thinking about resistances and I'm not sure which of two options is better: the classic Angband system, where you either have/don't have a resistance (complicated slightly with temp resistances and immunities and vulnerabilities), or the approach used by OAngband/EyAngband/FAAngband and most (all?) Diablo-ish games: each resistance on your equipment adds to the net total resistance. That doesn't have to be a percentile figure, e.g. in Torchlight resistance is a straight damage reduction. It's not a completely black-and-white situation, as there are sometimes resistance caps which render any additional resistance pointless- similar to already having a resistance in Angband's true/false system. I think I prefer Vanilla Angband's system, because the boolean nature of it makes having a resistance vs. having a "hole" a stark difference that clarifies the consequences of equipment decisions. On the other hand, the granularity that's usually present in the additive system means more possible variety. I'm interested to hear all your opinions on it, even though we're probably slightly biased towards Angband's way of doing it

February 9, 2011, 13:18	#8
buzzkill Prophet Join Date: May 2008 Location: Indiana, USA Posts: 2,773 Donated: $8	The additive FA/O system is better. It makes every resistance on every piece of equipment matter. It also provides some 'random' variability (just because you have rBase covered doesn't mean that they are covered equally). Furthermore, you can achieve higher levels of resistance without bothering with potions/spells (V-style double resists). __________________ www.mediafire.com/buzzkill - Get your 32x32 tiles here. UT32 now compatible Ironband and Quickband 9/6/2012. My banding life on Buzzkill's ladder.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Vanilla 3.2.0, resistances and abilities	Timo Pietilä	Development	20	December 28, 2010 13:57
Additive Multipliers	d_m	Vanilla	88	July 20, 2010 15:30
Resistances cumulative?	grassy	Vanilla	29	March 5, 2010 04:49
Ranged Weapons, Armor and Resistances. Oh my!	steeg1234321	Vanilla	8	March 18, 2008 18:36

February 9, 2011, 07:18	#2
Philip Swordsman Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Prague,Czech Republic Posts: 407	I went with the O system because I think it allows for more variety and such, and it allows for more specialization. Have 60% chaos resist? Guess who you're going after.

February 9, 2011, 09:14	#4
Philip Swordsman Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Prague,Czech Republic Posts: 407	Wait a sec. Are we all in agreement or do I just not understand the poll?

February 9, 2011, 10:35	#6
Philip Swordsman Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Prague,Czech Republic Posts: 407	OK, now I'm very confused, pampl seems to like the Vanilla system, but if I understand correctly I just voted for the O system. Maybe pampl hasn't voted either. To adress pampl's concern for the clear difference between holes and not holes I think it'll be still quite clear.

February 9, 2011, 13:57	#9
Philip Swordsman Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Prague,Czech Republic Posts: 407	So to set the record clear, it's actually 8-2, right?

February 9, 2011, 23:25	#10
pampl RePosBand maintainer Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Seattle, WA, USA Posts: 225	No doubt it was at the time you wrote it; as of now it's 9-5. Additive resistances are more popular than I would have predicted; I guess I should be considering them more seriously.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)