|
|
#11 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NL
Age: 42
Posts: 10
![]() |
Having read this, i tried to compile V3.3.2 on my Ubuntu 11.10.
-- Frontends -- - Curses No; missing libraries - GTK 2.x Disabled - X11 Yes - SDL Disabled - Test No - Stats No - SDL sound No; missing libraries It compiled without problems. (./configure ; make ; make install) Something definitely seems wrong with the SDL. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Angband Devteam member
|
How do you mean? You didn't configure it to build SDL - you need to run
./configure --enable-sdl to do that.
__________________
"3.4 is much better than 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3. It still is easier than 3.0.9, but it is more convenient to play without being ridiculously easy, so it is my new favorite of the versions." - Timo Pietila |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NL
Age: 42
Posts: 10
![]() |
What i mean is that if you compile without the SDL, it compiles without problem. If you (like raycluster) get the SDL packages and compile (based on the errormessages raycluster inlcuded) the libsdl seems to be the problem.
Or did you mean to say raycluster forgot to ./configure --enable-sdl ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Angband Devteam member
|
Quote:
Judging from raycluster's posts, it doesn't look like the problem is specific to SDL - but it would be good if s/he can confirm whether it builds without SDL configured. In other news, Angband 3.3.2 has just been uploaded to Debian Sid (unstable). So it should be in Wheezy (testing) in ten days, and in Ubuntu after that. Yay!
__________________
"3.4 is much better than 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3. It still is easier than 3.0.9, but it is more convenient to play without being ridiculously easy, so it is my new favorite of the versions." - Timo Pietila |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Apprentice
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Washington, DC Metropolitan Area
Age: 30
Posts: 55
![]() |
Unfortunately it has still not made it into Ubuntu..
__________________
Oh, Mr. Speaker, I had underestimated the tenderness of the feelings of the members opposite. --Barney Frank |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Angband Devteam member
|
Er ... https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/angband tells me it's in something called Precise ...
__________________
"3.4 is much better than 3.1, 3.2 or 3.3. It still is easier than 3.0.9, but it is more convenient to play without being ridiculously easy, so it is my new favorite of the versions." - Timo Pietila |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NL
Age: 42
Posts: 10
![]() |
Quote:
It would however probably require yet another upgrade (currently running ocelot), which i am not exactly looking forward to.. I'll stick to my own compiled version of 3.3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
NPPAngband Maintainer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Stat Gain, Angband
Posts: 701
![]() |
Quote:
LDFLAGS += -lSDL (Also for the post above)....A couple weeks ago I checked the Ubuntu Software Centre and searched for Angband, and I saw three Angband packages available for download.
__________________
NPPAngband current home page: http://forum.nppangband.org/ Source code repository: https://github.com/nppangband/NPPAngband |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: NL
Age: 42
Posts: 10
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Font size on ubuntu? | AltF4 | Vanilla | 5 | October 27, 2010 20:33 |
| Unangband Ubuntu install? | Whelk | Variants | 3 | July 26, 2010 05:49 |
| Ubuntu installation... | aaronchall | Vanilla | 10 | July 24, 2010 18:04 |
| Ubuntu Noob Needs Your Help!! | chris | Development | 3 | December 22, 2009 18:32 |
| Ubuntu SDL Help? | benhamill | Vanilla | 12 | February 24, 2009 21:19 |